Muzaffarpur4 minutes ago
There was a fierce ruckus in a college in Muzaffarpur on Sunday over the hijab. The principal told that the cent up examination was going on in the college. Some girls were sitting in the exam wearing hijab. The teacher suspected the girls to be wearing Bluetooth devices. On this, he asked the girls to remove the hijab and show their ears. On this the girls got angry and called the family.
The girl students alleged that the teacher forcibly asked her to remove the hijab, calling her a traitor and asked to go to Pakistan. The police also reached after the commotion. Later the principal explained to the girls and pacified the matter. The case is of Mahant Darshan Das Mahila College (MDDM).
Give your opinion by taking part in the poll…
this is the whole matter
Adiva, a student of the college, told that the St. Up exam was being taken in the college. During this, some girls came wearing hijab to take the exam. In the class room, teacher Ravi Bhushan told him that if you have come with Bluetooth, remove the hijab. The girls said that you should call the lady guard and get it checked. If any objectionable material comes out, then those people will go away without examination. The students allege that the teacher did not listen to them. They started saying that remove the hijab and throw it away.
After the hijab controversy, the girl students called their families and started a ruckus.
accused of talking about going to Pakistan
The girls accused the teacher Shashi Bhushan that he even called the girl students anti-national. They started saying that you live here and you sing from there. Just go to Pakistan. Due to this, the girls got angry and started creating a ruckus. Then they went out without taking the exam and started protesting at the gate.
The principal got the girls mobile phones kept before the exam.
Forcibly linking girls with religion: Principal
College principal Dr Kanupriya said that all this is a conspiracy to spoil the atmosphere. The history of the college is very old. All are Intermediate students. These people were asked to remove the mobile and remove the bluetooth. But he made it a separate issue and started arguing with religion.
This is a very shameful thing. The attendance of these girl students is also less than 75%. Now the education minister and the university have directed that the girl students with low attendance percentage will not be allowed to sit in the final exam. These people are creating unnecessary pressure. So that the college administration bows before them.
There was no talk of hijab and the teacher she is accusing did not say anything like anti-national and going to Pakistan. These people are unnecessarily exaggerating the matter by making concocted things.
The girls also got into trouble with the police. He was somehow explained and pacified.
On receiving the information, Shrikant Prasad Sinha, SHO of Mithanpura police reached the spot with the women constables. Tried to explain to the girls. They also got very involved with the police and there was a lot of debate. After some time the principal of the college, Dr. Kanu Priya arrived. He somehow pacified everyone by explaining them. The girls calmed down. Then after giving the exam, she went out of there silently.
Also read these news related to exam and cheating
HC verdict – Wearing hijab is not mandatory
On March 15, the Karnataka High Court dismissed a petition by some Muslim girl students of the Government Pre-University Girls College, Udupi, demanding that they wear hijab in class. Upholding its earlier order, the court said that wearing hijab is not a part of the essential practice of Islam. It does not need to be protected under Article 25 of the Constitution.
Supreme Court judges also divided on hijab ban: EXPERT said – Case can go to constitution bench, only CJI will decide the judge
The two-judge bench of the Supreme Court could not reach a consensus on the issue of ban on hijab. Now CJI UU Lalit has to decide to hand it over to the new bench. When the Supreme Court delivered its verdict on Thursday, the two-judge bench had differing views on the matter. After 10 days of hearing, the court had reserved the verdict. Click here to read full news