3 minutes ago
- copy link
Law Minister Kiren Rijiju lashed out at the judges on Tuesday. It is said that instead of giving justice, they are involved in other things. There should be some regulatory authority for these. Earlier the government used to appoint judges. The collegium system was started by the Supreme Court in 1998. Now he appoints the judges. Here the pain of the Law Minister is understandable. Actually, they are looking to appoint judges, it seems.
There might be some errors. which can be anywhere. can happen anytime. Of course they will also need to be repaired. So improve it. You are sitting in the government. Do something inside. Make an improvement What do you want to convey or convey by making such public statements about judges and judiciary? Why are you spreading the judiciary’s axles like this in any program of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, being the Law Minister?
The Law Minister did not stop there. They say that you will not see anything from outside, but inside there is big politics going on among the judges.
It is said that there is a Code of Ethics in the Parliament, but there is no such system in the Judiciary. Should be Now will the Minister of LAW be pleased to state that unnecessary uproar in Parliament, paper, documents, tossing, pushing and not even allowing the speaker to speak comes under the Code of Ethics? Have all MPs been following Ethics?
It is not hidden from anyone how the MP funds are used and misused. Who has to give, who is not to give, on what conditions, does not the public see all this? Speak on this too!
If politics is going on within the judges, then who is responsible for letting it run? What is the job of the Law Minister? …and if you have no rights, then mobilize the rights. Who has stopped? At least don’t ridicule the judiciary in public like this!
Well you are saying then something or the other will happen. Otherwise, how does a retired Chief Justice get a big post? After all, some ideas must come from power. Otherwise, what’s the point of such a big reward after retiring?