Rijiju shared the VIDEO of ex-judge: said- Public’s representative is necessary in SC, but some people consider themselves above the constitution

  • Hindi News
  • National
  • Kiren Rijiju | Law Minister On PM Modi Govt Vs Supreme Court Collegium Controversy

New Delhi15 minutes ago

Former judge RS Sodhi had said in an interview to a YouTube channel that the Supreme Court has hijacked the Constitution.

In the Government vs Supreme Court Collegium controversy, Union Law Minister Kiren Rijiju has shared the statement of a former Delhi High Court judge. Judge RS Sodhi had said in an interview to a YouTube channel that the Supreme Court has hijacked the Constitution. If there is an elected representation of the public in the Supreme Court, then only the public gets justice.

The Law Minister has shared the video of this interview on social media. Rijiju supported Sodhi’s statement saying that it is a noble voice of a judge. This is the most sensible approach. This is the sensible opinion of most of the people of the country. They also feel that there should be a representative of the public in the Supreme Court. Only those people do not follow the provisions of the constitution and the opinion of the people, who consider themselves above the constitution.

Rijiju said – The beauty of democracy is its success
Law Minister Rijiju said- The real beauty of Indian democracy is its success. The people rule themselves through their representatives. Elected representatives represent the interests of the people and make laws. Our judiciary is independent, but our constitution is supreme.

Retired Delhi High Court judge RS Sodhi gave his stand in an interview given to a YouTube channel, which was justified by Kiren Rijiju. (file photo)

Video of November 2022, read what the former judge said…
When our constitution was made, there was a system in it, there was a whole chapter on how judges are appointed. Those who say that this system is unconstitutional can talk about amending the constitution. Parliament will do this amendment, but the Supreme Court has hijacked the constitution itself. He said that we will appoint ourselves and the government will have no hand in this.

The High Court does not come under the Supreme Court. It is an independent institution of every state. The judges of the High Court are appointed by the judges of the Supreme Court. And Supreme Court judges are appointing themselves. In such a situation, the judges of the High Court, who considered themselves independent in the state, start looking towards the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court transfers whomever it wants to send.

With such functioning, the High Court becomes subordinate to the Supreme Court, which our constitution has never said. The Supreme Court is supreme in its sphere, the High Court was supreme in its sphere, but now all the judges of the High Court wag their tail behind the Supreme Court. Is this a good thing?’

The Supreme Court itself has taken away the sovereignty that belongs to the Parliament. People have appointed the Parliament, not the judges of the Supreme Court. In this context, is the Supreme Court the voice of the people or is the Parliament the voice of the people? We should understand whether the Parliament is supreme in making laws or the Supreme Court is supreme? The Supreme Court cannot make laws. He has no right. Then there is no need for the Parliament, but at this time there is a deadlock-like situation between the Parliament and the Supreme Court. Both are determined to declare themselves supreme to each other, so how will it be resolved.

The appointing authority in the country rests with the President. So they will decide that whatever appointment they will make, with whose opinion they will do it. The President decides whom to appoint with the help of the Council of Ministers. In such a situation, the Parliament became supreme. In a democracy, the supremacy of the Parliament cannot be denied. This is not dictatorship, the Supreme Court is going towards dictatorship, but it should always be remembered that the Supreme Court is not elected by the people, so it cannot be Supreme.

Also read these news related to collegium system dispute…

Government bid- Include our representatives in the Supreme Court Collegium: Law Minister’s letter to CJI- This will ensure transparency-accountability in the 25-year-old system

The Central Government has advised the Supreme Court to include its representatives in the collegium. Law Minister Kiren Rijiju has written a letter to the CJI saying that involving government representatives in the process of appointment of judges will bring transparency in the system and accountability towards the public. Read the full news here…

Center’s objection on judge appointment- SC’s reply in the letter: said- criticism of government’s policies is not the basis to stop promotion

The Supreme Court Collegium has taken a major step amid the tussle between the Center and the judiciary over the appointment of judges. The Supreme Court on Thursday issued three letters on its website rebutting the objections raised by the Center and RAW-IB on the promotion of advocates Saurabh Kripal, Somashekhar Sundaresan and R John Sathyan. Along with this, SC also answered the objections of the Center on the issue. Read the full news here…

There is more news…