Top Stories

Jharkhand High Court: Hearing in the matter of investment in shell companies of close friends of CM Soren, decision will come on June 3

June 1, 2022
Bharat Times

hear the news

On Wednesday, the Jharkhand High Court heard the matter of investment in shell companies set up by close associates of Jharkhand Chief Minister Hemant Soren. The arguments of all the parties have been completed in the High Court. The court will deliver its verdict on June 3. The court has reserved judgment on the validity of the petition. The court only heard the validity of the petition of Chief Minister Hemant Soren, his brother Basant Soren and their close associates in the investment case in the shell company. During the hearing, the court reminded the government of Rajdharma, citing the line of Kautilya’s Arthashastra. The hearing was held in a division bench of Chief Justice Dr Ravi Ranjan and Justice SN Prasad. Famous Supreme Court lawyers Kapil Sibal, Mukul Rohatgi defended the government and Hemant Soren. Kapil Sibal on behalf of Hemant Sarkar gave his argument in this matter.

court reminded rajdharma
The question arose in the court that CM Hemant Soren has filed an affidavit in the court, but did not appear even once. How did you sign the affidavit? On this, Hemant Soren’s lawyer Mukul Rohatgi said that the petition has been filed out of malice. The court said that the rule has no regard for the law. The counsel for the petitioner has referred to this observation of the Chief Justice in his supplementary. CM Soren’s lawyer said that the king’s own happiness is nothing, the happiness of the people is the king’s happiness and his interest is only in the interest of the people.

ED’s advocate Tushar Mehta said that the state is full of mineral wealth and necessary action should be taken when its protectors have become eaters. It is the main cause of many criminal activity. When a national level investigating agency files an affidavit in this context, it is wrong to question the credibility of that petition. After hearing all the parties, the court has reserved the decision till June 3.

Kapil Sibal’s argument, facts hidden in the petition
Kapil Sibal told the court that facts have been suppressed in the petition, which is in violation of the Jharkhand High Court rule. He questioned the earlier court order and the credibility of the petitioner. They argued for an hour and a half. Now it is being argued on behalf of the plaintiff. Sibal said that the petition should be dismissed due to suppression of facts.

Expansion

On Wednesday, the Jharkhand High Court heard the matter of investment in shell companies set up by close associates of Jharkhand Chief Minister Hemant Soren. The arguments of all the parties have been completed in the High Court. The court will deliver its verdict on June 3. The court has reserved judgment on the validity of the petition. The court only heard the validity of the petition in the case of Chief Minister Hemant Soren, his brother Basant Soren and their close associates investing in a shell company. During the hearing, the court reminded the government of Rajdharma, citing the line of Kautilya’s Arthashastra. The hearing was held in a division bench of Chief Justice Dr Ravi Ranjan and Justice SN Prasad. Famous Supreme Court lawyers Kapil Sibal, Mukul Rohatgi defended the government and Hemant Soren. Kapil Sibal on behalf of Hemant Sarkar gave his argument in this matter.

court reminded rajdharma

The question arose in the court that CM Hemant Soren has filed an affidavit in the court, but did not appear even once. How did you sign the affidavit? On this, Hemant Soren’s lawyer Mukul Rohatgi said that the petition has been filed out of malice. The court said that the rule has no regard for the law. The counsel for the petitioner has referred to this observation of the Chief Justice in his supplementary. CM Soren’s lawyer said that the king’s own happiness is nothing, the happiness of the people is the king’s happiness and his interest is only in the interest of the people.

ED’s advocate Tushar Mehta said that the state is full of mineral wealth and necessary action should be taken when its protectors have become eaters. It is the main cause of many criminal activity. When a national level investigating agency files an affidavit in this context, it is wrong to question the credibility of that petition. After hearing all the parties, the court has reserved the decision till June 3.

Kapil Sibal’s argument, facts hidden in the petition

Kapil Sibal told the court that facts have been suppressed in the petition, which is in violation of the Jharkhand High Court rule. He questioned the earlier court order and the credibility of the petitioner. They argued for an hour and a half. Now it is being argued on behalf of the plaintiff. Sibal said that the petition should be dismissed due to suppression of facts.