Ashneer Grover Alleges Oppression, Mismanagement Against BharatPe; Approaches NCLT – News18

Ashneer Grover. (File photo)

Ashneer Grover requests NCLT to order inspection and audit of the company by Ministry of Corporate Affairs and to revert any shares/ESOPs issued since his resignation on March 1, 2022

Ashneer Grover, co-founder and former managing director of BharatPe, has moved the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), alleging oppressive conduct and mismanagement by the board of the fintech firm. In his petition, Grover has prayed for reinstating him as managing director of the company and declare as “illegal” changes in the management of the company by altering the board of Resilient Innovations Pvt Ltd, which is doing business as BharatPe.

He has also requested NCLT to order inspection and audit of the company by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs and to revert any shares/ESOPs issued since his resignation on March 1, 2022. Grover has also sought revocation of termination of his wife Madhuri Jain by the board, terming it “illegal”. He has also asked for removal of any new member inducted on the board after his exit.

Moreover, he has requested NCLT to direct winding up of the company in the “interest of justice” in the petition filed under Sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act 2013, which deals with oppression and mismanagement. Grover’s plea came for a hearing last week on December 6, where his counsel sought time to address the issue of maintainability further.

A two-member bench comprising members Mahandra Khandelwal and Rahul Bhatnagar was directed to list the matter on January 11, 2024, for the next hearing. Grover has submitted he has a “prima facie” case on merits and the balance of convenience lies in his favour. In case relief is not granted, then grave irreparable harm, loss and injury would be caused to him, as per the petition.

In his petition, Grover has mentioned 12 respondents, including the company, its founder Shasvat Nakrani, Chairman Rajnish Kumar, former CEO and director Sushil Sameer and other directors and officials of Resilient Innovations. Grover has alleged that he has a “coerced termination from the employment” of the company in an arbitrary manner and clawback of his restrictive shares “illegally, arbitrarily” without due compliance of the law.

The voice of a director and the largest individual shareholder of BharatPe has been muffled in order to mismanage the affairs of the company, he alleged. “The entire conduct of the board of directors of Respondent No 1 (BharatPe) from sending the petitioner (Grover) on a temporary leave over a fabricated issue that has nothing to do with the affairs of the company to sending the petitioner of compulsory leave by passing a board resolution in excessive exercise and abuse of its power forcing to resign from Respondent No 1 company is nothing but conducting its affairs in a manner contrary to and prejudicial to …. ,” he submitted.

He also questioned the haste on the part of BharatPe management to invoke arbitration at the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC).

Last month, Ashneer Grover and his wife Madhuri Jain Grover were stopped at the Indira Gandhi International (IGI) Airport by the Economic Offences Wing (EOW) of Delhi Police while they were travelling to New York for a vacation. On that, Ashneer Grover said he received EOW summons only 7 hours after returning from airport.

The development came after allegations that Grover’s family siphoned off funds from BharatPe on the pretext of offering recruitment services, gave bank accounts numbers that were created after the dates when they were raised, as per the EOW’s preliminary report of an investigation.

Last year, BharatPe had filed a criminal complaint with the Delhi Police’s Economic Offences Wing on 17 counts, including embezzlement, forgery, and criminal breach of trust, which could land the Grovers in jail for up to 10 years if proven guilty.

According to a lawsuit brought by BharatPe, Grover’s wife Madhuri Jain approved payments totalling Rs 7.6 crore to eight such vendors who did not assist the company in recruiting any employees.

(With Inputs from PTI)